<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marriage: Equality&#8217;s Final Frontier &#8211; Why DOMA Matters</title>
	<atom:link href="/2011/08/marriag-equalitys-final-frontier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://outservemag.org/2011/08/marriag-equalitys-final-frontier/</link>
	<description>The association of actively serving LGBT military personnel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 20:58:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://outservemag.org/2011/08/marriag-equalitys-final-frontier/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outservemag.org/?p=21#comment-199</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately  the Supreme Court has ruled (past ruling) in favor of Congress as they are the sole body that make the rules (under the Constitution) for the military.  The Univ George Law review has made note to the LGBT community, that they doubt DOMA could be over turned (or even looked at) by the current Supreme Court.  Good Luck through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately  the Supreme Court has ruled (past ruling) in favor of Congress as they are the sole body that make the rules (under the Constitution) for the military.  The Univ George Law review has made note to the LGBT community, that they doubt DOMA could be over turned (or even looked at) by the current Supreme Court.  Good Luck through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Wilfahrt</title>
		<link>http://outservemag.org/2011/08/marriag-equalitys-final-frontier/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Wilfahrt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 17:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outservemag.org/?p=21#comment-43</guid>
		<description>I hope something gives on these cases before November 2012 when MN goes to the polls with a one man, one woman definition of marriage for the state constitution.

Jeff Wilfahrt, Rosemount, MN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope something gives on these cases before November 2012 when MN goes to the polls with a one man, one woman definition of marriage for the state constitution.</p>
<p>Jeff Wilfahrt, Rosemount, MN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
